
Disclaimer: OWC does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Before implementing suggestions on this site, always seek advice from qualified health professionals. Everyone's bio-chemistry and life is unique. Expert assessment is invaluable. This site is for informational purposes only. Member contributed content is the opinion and viewpoint exclusively of the member publisher. Visit "Legal" for more information.
© Online Wellness Community Inc., 2010, 2011. All Rights Reserved. "DMR" is patent pending technology of Web 3 Network Inc.
Is Organic Food Really Better for You – Stanford Research Study Findings
Published By Tom Cifelli, Executive Editor on September 5, 2012
This article by Mike of Natural News is worth reprinting due to the ongoing controversies over benefits of organic verses non-organic product.
Republished article follows:
Flawed organic foods study really just a media psyop to confuse the public about organics while pushing GMOs, by Mike Adams, September 4, 2012, the Health Ranger, Natural News Executive Editor
If you read the mainstream news headlines today, you might be shocked to see headlines that say things like, “Organic foods no healthier than conventional foods” or “Organic foods may not be healthier for you.” You’ll see these headlines all across the usual disinfo outlets: NPR, Associated Press, Reuters, Washington Post, WebMD and elsewhere.
The problem with these headlines is that they are flatly false. The study these news outlets are quoting actually confirms that organic foods are far healthier for you than conventional foods.
So how is the mainstream media lying about this? By fudging the facts, of course.
For starters, the “study” isn’t even a study. It was just a review of other studies. No new laboratory analysis was done whatsoever!
The “review” was conducted at Stanford University and published in the Annals of Internal Medicine. You can read the abstract here:
http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=1355685
The study itself concludes:
How the media lied
Somehow, the mainstream media took this study and then lied to their readers, claiming organic food is “no different” than conventional food. That is a flat-out lie, of course. Because it fails to mention all the following:
A total psyop to confuse the public and push GMOs
Ultimately, this study comes down to being a total psyop pushed by the mainstream media for the purpose of confusing the public and ultimately promoting GMOs.
The media’s coverage of this is pure disinfo along the lines of other health disinfo campaigns such as:
Anthony Gucciardi, by the way, has published an excellent video overview of the deception regarding this issue:
http://naturalsociety.com/ridiculous-study-claims-organic-same-as-con…
OWC Editor Notes:
Learn more about Organic Raw Foods by clicking here. Organic standards are evolving. This editor expects shocking future news about certain allowable organic standards not proving truly non-toxic. Nevertheless organic farming is more sustainable, minimizes use of harmful substances, and produce where you eat the exterior are always better if organic. Items where you likely discard the exterior, such as avocados and oranges, are considered by many as not worth paying extra for organic. If you can afford to, buy and consume all organic. Otherwise, save your pennies for fruit and vegetables grown above ground and those of which you eat the exterior.